We aim to make the code understandable, maintainable and extensible to allow others to actively develop. The core libraries are highly optimized to allow for good performance also for nondistributed algorithms. If the author of the software does want the users to receive a copy of the software, they can license it under the agpl. Describes the ability to use the software for commercial purposes. Weve compiled a list of your top 10 questions about the gpl license in the last post.
The apache license is a permissive open source software license so you can. Further, according to the apache contributor license agreementcla terms you are not required to share the modified software which makes it commercially friendly. The commercially friendly and permissive apache license v2. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain. Heres the second post in our open source software license faq series. Why are the license files for the different apache software foundation projects. What is the difference between gnu gpl 2 and 3 licenses. Can i use a apache v2 licensed driver for a commercial project. If its worth money to you its important to get your licensing right. Products derived from this software may not be called apache, nor may apache appear in their name, without prior written permission of the apache software foundation. The commerciallyfriendly copyleft eclipse license provides the ability to. One has the gnu lgpl 3 license and the other has the apache software license, version 2. Please note that this license is not compatible with gpl version 2, because it has. It is mainly based on the openehr specifications, an open platform.
Contribute to apachemahout development by creating an account on github. The apache license is a permissive free software license written by the apache software. On july 19, 2017, the asf board established apache madlib as a top level project, which was approved by unanimous vote of the directors present. The commerciallyfriendly and permissive apache license v2 has become an industry standard within the open source world, helping launch billion. Mahout is distributed under a commercially friendly apache software license. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without selling the software. Its a popular and widely deployed license backed by a. The font will be included as texture in a modified form with some decorations. Daisy is licensed under the commerciallyfriendly apache license 2. Gplv3 of june 29, 2007 contains the basic intent of gplv2 and is an open source license with a strict copyleft what t.
Open source licenses explained in this detailed guide. Can i use a apache v2 licensed driver for a commercial project without revealing sources of the project. To date, hundreds of thousands of software solutions have been distributed under the apache license, with web requests from within every unrecognized nation. To apply the apache license to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets replaced with your own identifying information. Im using nativescript which is licensed under the apache 2. Apache brooklyn software is released under the apache license v2. The commerciallyfriendly and permissive apache license v2 is an open source industry standard, helping launch billion dollar corporations and benefiting countless users worldwide. Are open source licenses recognized under indian copyright.
On july 8, 2019, madlib completed its sixth release as an apache software foundation top level project. This license is administered bythe apache software foundationand you can find their site at. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions. Voiceover the final license that will be coveredin detail is the apache license, which is now at version 2. The mit license has all the traits of the apache license besides remaining silent on the contributor license agreementcla about sharing the modified software. We provide a couple of bundles components providing specific functionality and tools to help you. Apache shardingsphere software is released under the apache license v2. It is not a copy left license and it addresses several matters that are important to. It is not a copy left license, and it addresses several matters that are important to established companies and their lawyers. What opensource licenses are more corporatefriendly, i. The fsf suggests the quite permissive apache license for that case described later in that article. Make a pull request to suggest this license for a project that is not licensed. It is not a copy left license and it addresses several matters that are important to established companies and their lawyers.
The terms state that users cant remove existing, patent, trademarks and attribution notices. Describes the warranty and if the software license owner can be charged for damages. I recommend the apache license specifically, version 2. The apache software foundation and the free software foundation agree that the apache license 2. Ehrbase is an open source software backend for clinical application systems and electronic health records. The apache software foundation the apache software foundation provides support for the apache community of opensource software projects.
The gpl puts no limits on using free software commercially, its not mentioned at all. Describes the ability to modify the software and create derivatives. Ideally i looked for components licensed under the apache software license. The commerciallyfriendly and permissive apache license v2. Can i use a apache v2 licensed driver for a commercial. To my understanding, if i modify the library, i need to give the source of the library with the changes highlighted. Here is what the institute for legal questions on free and open source software says about gplv2 and gplv3 emphasis added. Apache projects power most of the internet, manage exabytes of data, execute teraflops of operations, and store billions of objects in virtually every industry. The software is opensource and licensed under the liberal and commercially friendly apache 2. Can i use an open source library licensed under apache. Open source license selection in relation to business models. Open source content management systems cms in java.
Corporatefriendly open source licenses closed ask question. The goal of mahout is to build a vibrant, responsive, diverse community to facilitate discussions not only on the project itself but also on potential use cases. The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. One of the most popular open source licenses is the commerciallyfriendly apache license, under which millions of software solutions have been distributed to allow for their redistribution and usage. A project management committee pmc guides the projects daytoday operations, including community development and product releases.
Provided that i do not intend to change nativescript itseft, but im using it to develop an application, am i expected to give attribution to the license andor nativescript in the final app that i deliver. If you were wondering whether you can use apache licensed code in your commercial applications and what do you need to do in order to comply with the license heres the unofficial simple ans short answer. This license is considered to be the mostcommercially favorable of all the opensource licenses. Word processors android apps ios apps commercial trademarked formerly proprietary formerly opensource.